All comments are edited for length and content. Due to content or space limitations some comments may not be published. Please limit your calls to two minutes or less. Repeat messages on the same subject adding to the length will not be published.
+ + +
Among many calls concerning the football team, a man said, “year after year our freshman football team goes 9-1, 8-2. When they get moved up to the varsity level we can’t even play on the same field as the teams we play. It’s coaching. The kids are playing against the same kids as before. It’s stale. It’s not football they’re playing. Get him out.”
A man called in response “to the person (last week) calling our current football coach a legend. When you coach for nearly 30 years you better have close to 200 wins. Do the math. The guy is a legend in his own mind.”
Another caller had similar comments. “How can you call somebody a legend that hasn’t even won a league title or hasn’t even won three games in league play? The guy’s been wanting to leave Madera for how many years, and he can’t find another job, so he’s sitting here collecting a pay check from Madera Unified.”
A woman wondered why we were not writing about “the freshman (football) team. They are doing so well. You are just bringing our boys down by not talking about it. I wish you would do more.” (Note: With four high school varsity sports and a limited pool of local sports writers, it would be hard to cover freshman sports at any of the high schools.)
“I went to the (Old Timers Day) parade on Saturday,” began a woman, “and I loved it, especially the marching bands. The only complaint I had was (that) the Madera north (Madera High School) pep squad and flag bearers had their undergarments showing… That wasn’t very tasteful.”
Another lady called “in regards to the Madera parade. I really enjoyed it. But I was disappointed in all the business cards and all the flyers left behind. The garbage that was left, and no one around to pick it up. They didn’t even bother to clean up downtown.”
A woman responded to “the lady complaining about the policeman in the alley. She should be grateful that they are patrolling the area that way. Otherwise her house would have been broken into three times over. Also the woman who was complaining about panhandling; you shouldn’t be so hard on these people. Be grateful you have something with the economy the way it is.”
The announcer for the football games called in response to last week’s caller complaining about his way of announcing the games. “I am the announcer and I do it on a voluntary basis. I have not gotten any complaints from any other fans or administrators or athletic director. I do this because no one else wanted to do the announcing. I am out there for the kids. If I was out there for my own benefit, I would not do it for free.”
“Last Saturday was your monthly edition with Mo’s Meanderings,” began a gentleman. “I really enjoyed how it was not your typical travelogue you read in Sunset or the AAA magazine. Mr. Emo made a wonderful story out of it, and still gave all the information on the Renaissance Faire.”
A regular caller wanted to “congratulate Chuck Doud. He eliminates rhetoric and finds a point and plays it out, unbiased. Thank you, very much.” He also mentioned he “misses Jim Glynn and his article.”
After seeing “a police officer in his patrol car at the Cleveland and Country Club railroad crossing, and a car parked right behind the officer on the tracks.” The caller wondered “after a big article in the paper stating that was illegal to do” why the driver wasn’t cited. “He (the officer) let him get away. Why don’t we practice what we preach?”
An online visitor, self-identified as “Michelle Johnson,” writes, “Are we taxpayers paying for each school to have their Web sites on the Internet? If so then it is a waste of taxpayers money. They are outdated, useless, and just taking up space. I tried to access Desmond’s classroom Web sites to review what homework was assigned. The homework was for last year. The school Web site was dated for graduation last year.”
Web readers reacted to a column by Chuck Doud that was skeptical of how prudent it would be to rebuild the lower parts of New Orleans if another flood hit.
“Doctorj2u” writes, “Here is an idea for you. Why not supply New Orleans with the flood defenses found in most of the other great world ports? What the Corps of Engineers is doing is patching the present woefully inadequate levees. Why? Because Congress will not fund the project. They are setting up the next disaster, not the millions of Americans in southern Louisiana.”
“Jinx” writes, “Three years into the rebuilding and yet one can still walk through areas that look like a bomb went off yesterday. Three years and the homelessness rate is still growing because of the lack of housing. … $126 billion (to rebuild the Gulf Coast) in three years —some of it still not dispersed, a lot of it wasted— sounds like a whole lot of money, but compare it to the projected $859.9 billion we will spend this year alone on the war and on it doesn’t sound like all that much to rebuild our own country.”
+ + +
Thank you for your calls. Remember, the Red Line is open for your messages 24 hours a day by calling 674-4478, or by visiting www.maderatribuneredline.com.